As rain offers a welcome relief to fire-scorched Australia, over flash floods and freshwater contamination cast a shadow on the joy. Already, have been reported due to heavy ash and sediment in local streams.
and might become so polluted from the fires that the current water supply infrastructure will be challenged or could no longer treat the water.
Flash floods and water contamination after large-scale wildfires are emerging as real hazards in Australia and many other places, threatening drinking water, ecosystems, infrastructures and recreational activities.
Water supply from forests is at risk
In many ways, this is not surprising. Forests to 90 per cent of the world's most populous cities, and most of these forests already yield degraded water quality. Forests also provide other like flood control, hydroelectricity, fishing and recreational opportunities.
Our clearly showed Australia's water supply was at high risk from wildfires. We also found areas on every continent except Antarctica face similar risks. In North America, have created new challenges for forest and water managers.
Post-fire water hazards
Wildfires can have many detrimental impacts on water supplies. The effects can last for and include drinking water pollution, reservoir sedimentation, flash floods and reduced recreational benefits from rivers.
These impacts represent a growing hazard as populations expand, and communities encroach onto forest landscapes.
Looking closer, wildfires that comes from upstream forests and the seasonal timing of water flows. Such changes complicate water resource allocation as less water might be available during periods of high demand.
When rainstorms follow large and severe wildfires, they tend to flush ash, nutrients, , and sediments into streams and rivers. This contamination from wildfires causes problems for the health of downstream rivers and lakes, as well as safe drinking water production.
Mercury, which can be deposited on leaves and absorbed by plants, is a particular concern. During a fire, in nearby lakes, wetlands and other water, where in the food web, and into fish, that are caught and eaten by people. Indigenous communities living in fire-prone forests in Canada and who already struggle with mercury contamination might be particularly exposed.
Risks in North America
Polluted water creates many expensive, difficult and long-lasting challenges for the drinking water treatment process. For example, water remained difficult to treat for after the 2002 Hayman fire in Colorado.
The quality of the water after the fire increased the chances of forming undesirable byproducts of . These toxic chemicals had to be removed before the water could be supplied to more than half a million users in Denver.
But most of the fire-prone areas in North America lack large-scale vulnerability assessments of their municipal water supplies-and not because the risks are inconsequential.
In Canada and the United States, one large and severe wildfire might increase drinking water production costs by US$10 million to US$100 million. In southern California, after wildfires caused 23 deaths and produced more than US$100 million of structural damage in 2018.
The financial burden of these changes is eventually carried by taxpayers. Adopting nature-friendly solutions to reduce severe wildfires in upstream forests, such as under controlled conditions, will lower the bill and provide better protection of water services.
Protecting the source
Forest health is and the . This trend will likely continue because of linked to human activities.
Climate projections suggest that fires will happen and become . also increases the likelihood of these fires happening in the vicinity of homes.
Combined with increased rainfall and declining snowfall, this makes river flows and the quality of surface water less predictable. Consequently, water supplies become .
In light of these environmental changes and the inevitability of wildfires, countries like Canada and the United States can expect with impacts similar in magnitude to what is now happening in Australia.
Therefore, governments need to seize , such as leveraging existing data and taking advantage of growing computing power, to measure . A tailored wildfire-water risk reduction strategy can help achieve better source water protection, improve infrastructure and foster preventive disaster planning.
There is no doubt we will learn more as our knowledge of . Instead of reinventing the wheel, we must try to keep water in the landscape by , and accept a when offered.
Because ultimately, forests and clean water resources are of paramount importance to our own future.
is a post-doctoral fellow in environmental geography in the Department of Renewable Resources at the 天涯社区. Dennis W. Hallema is a research assistant professor at North Carolina State University. Kevin D. Bladon is an assistant professor at Oregon State University.
This originally appeared Feb. 11 in The Conversation.